• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

I'm very sorry, but I only want to use lenses brighter than F4.0.

I'll give you a third of a point and go up to F4.5.

For zoom lenses, F2.8 is ideal,

and for prime lenses, I'd like to use F2 for full frame and F1.4 for APS-C size.

I want to be able to crop full frame and switch between them, so F1.4 for full frame is ideal.

A lens that's strong in backlight and doesn't produce purple fringing.

For prime lenses, it's interesting to use old lenses, but purple fringing is a problem.

And yet, I'm being selfish and saying that small and light lenses are better.

Sorry, camera and lens manufacturers.

Furthermore, I would like them to be sold at a price that ordinary people can afford, if possible.

I'm really sorry.

While I'm at it, I'll also be talking to myself about what kind of camera I need and want.

For my main camera, I have a mirrorless digital camera that is small and light, and is suitable for hybrid photography.

I want to use both full-frame and APS-C depending on the situation.

I'm a hybrid type who mainly takes photos but also wants to take videos seriously, so I want to be able to switch between them quickly.

But as I've said many times before, photography is my main focus.

(I also use a flash, so ease of use is also important.)

When I go out to take photos, I like dual slots and take more than one body.

(When I say more than one body, I mean either a complete spare, or two or three at a time.)

I'm the kind of person who doesn't feel at ease unless I have more than two lenses with focal lengths that I plan to use to photograph the main subject.

Those two bodies can be two with different characteristics, or they can be ultra-compact and lightweight to provide the minimum acceptable image quality as a true spare, and they also vary depending on the situation.

These are the most important things.

Even when I'm going for a walk, shopping, or eating out, and I'm not going out to take photos, I take my camera with me like a smartphone or wallet.

I also place a little importance on things like that.

Then, if I were to draw the second border line,

I would say that by default I like the image creation style of the camera manufacturer.

I like the feel of the grip, the shutter feeling, the design, and the feel of the camera.

It should be sturdy, unbreakable, and always reliable without hanging up.

I really like the viewfinder shooting style, so it should be a good viewfinder.

This does not mean that high resolution or accurate color and brightness display are the most important things.

It is also important that the viewfinder does not tire you out even after a long time, and that it is easy to judge the exposure.

I also place importance on ease of use of manual exposure settings and manual focus.

The third border line would be

high quality images, number of continuous shots, subject recognition, and AF technology.

(I think that a mid-class camera from about 10 years ago has the minimum functionality and performance,

and the rest is to cover differences in the amount of pictures you can take, technical ability, and luck.)

This is also the stage where battery life, small size, and light weight are also important.

Speed ​​of startup, USB-C standard, ease of charging, compatibility with existing equipment, versatility, etc.

If possible, I would like to use the same camera in any situation, whether I'm taking a leisurely stroll or cutting down on my battle preparations.

Wow! It can do this? I would give it a star for features that make me think.

I also consider things like not needing post-processing and reducing the stress of desk work.

Everyone has their own preferences, but one thing that can be said for all photographers is that it makes you excited.

The most important thing is to make you want to take pictures and have fun taking them!

I want to go on a trip with such a camera!!

I took a picture in a parking lot while I was shopping.

This encounter reminded me of my trip to Australia in a Volkswagen Combi van.